In recent years, executive agreements made by presidents have become a hot topic in the United States. These agreements are a type of international agreement that allows the president to make deals with other countries without seeking the approval of the United States Senate. Instead, executive agreements are approved solely by the president`s authority.
Executive agreements have become increasingly popular in recent years, as presidents look for ways to bypass a potentially uncooperative Congress. For example, President Obama used executive agreements to negotiate diplomatic relationships with Cuba and Iran, as well as to implement parts of the Paris Climate Agreement.
However, executive agreements have also been criticized as unconstitutional, as they bypass the checks and balances put in place by the Constitution. The Constitution requires that all treaties be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate, in order to ensure that the president cannot unilaterally commit the nation to international obligations.
Despite this criticism, executive agreements have become an important tool for presidents in recent years. The benefits of executive agreements are that they allow the United States to make important international agreements quickly and efficiently, without the delays that often come with the traditional treaty-making process. This is particularly important in an era of rapid globalization, where international agreements can have a significant impact on the United States and the world as a whole.
In conclusion, executive agreements made by presidents have become an important and controversial topic in the United States. Whether they are constitutional or not, it is clear that executive agreements are an important tool for presidents to use when negotiating with other countries. As such, it is likely that we will continue to see executive agreements being used by presidents in the future.